Quick, lively, pungent -- just a good job all around. The take away point is that the "lesson of Galileo" is almost the polar opposite of what everybody thinks it is. Galileo was in hot water because the Church had compromised with the best science available Aristotelianism , and when the science changed, the Church was in a jam. Kind of like today when the science of microbiology makes Darwinianism at the cellular level kind of buffoonish, and yet the best brains in This was a really fun read.
Kind of like today when the science of microbiology makes Darwinianism at the cellular level kind of buffoonish, and yet the best brains in the Church signed us up for indentured servanthood that is due to last for another decade or so. Nov 13, Piper rated it really liked it. I thoroughly enjoyed this book. The author did an excellent job of explaining the scientific concepts of Galileo's day in such a way that even those who struggle with science can grasp them. This was a good overview of the life of Galileo. Jul 25, F rated it it was ok.
Galileo (Christian Encounters Series)
Part of a series of books entitled "Christian Encounters" it falls a little short of that. No real testimonial of any Christian experience given in this book, nor, I'm told by a family member who read it, does the Winston Churchill book in the same series. Galileo is said to be a good Catholic but even that is not defined. Did he place his trust solely in Christ?
We are left with no answer. The author does a good job recounting the general history of Galileo and I probably would have rated the bo Part of a series of books entitled "Christian Encounters" it falls a little short of that. The author does a good job recounting the general history of Galileo and I probably would have rated the book higher had it delivered on the promise of the series, but alas, it did not. I would not even necessarily call this a Christian book. It is clear of bad language. Galileo's affair is not romanticized but neither is it condemned.
To say that science is not my best subject, would be an understatement. I am horrible at it, but math is much worse for me to understand and deal with.
- Bolt review.
- Practicing Our Faith: A Way of Life for a Searching People (The Practices of Faith Series).
- On Contempt for the World or De Contemptu Mundi.
Science is my veritable forte compared to mathematics. I will say that the author, Mitch Stokes, helped to explain the issues well enough to make it clear that Galileo's supposed brave stand for secularism is an absolute myth that insults Galileo by denying his immense faith in Christ. It was To say that science is not my best subject, would be an understatement. It was a battle of philosophies, and that is where this review will focus. Plato and Aristotle have had a HUGE impact on the study of philosophy and religion, due to the reworking of their ideas in the writings of Augustine and Aquinas, for each man respectively.
This has had good and bad results both. The good results are the ways in which intellectualism and logic were shown to be compatible with faith, as was science. This has been key to the development of Western thought. The nature of science was, at first, to examine how God created the universe to bring Him glory.
And, of course, many are those who have been attracted by the existence of a religion that is not afraid of being disproved by science. However, for all of this good, there has been a very dark side to this. And that is the dependence that many Christians historically have had on the ideas of Plato and Aristotle as reinterpreted by major thinkers in the Christian tradition. Stokes persuasively argues how the so-called "Galileo affair" was not an instance of science versus religious faith, but of science versus false logic.
There was more to it in the form of personality conflicts, malicious rumors, and hurt feelings, but this is what it all boils down towards in the end. However, he also agreed to travel to Rome and accept what he thought would be a severe punishment instead of fleeing to other Italian city-states that had actually offered him asylum. He did this out of a desire to not be thought of as a bad Catholic or Christian. If he had seen how he would be lionized as a champion of secular science at least by the modern idea of secularism, as opposed to his definition which the Catholic Church would later adopt , he would have been horrified.
- Shared Service Center - Kurzüberblick (German Edition).
In the end, Galileo had affirmed the primacy of the Church, and agreed with the Bible. In modern times, he has been vindicated, as his methodology of Biblical interpretation in relation to the natural world is the one stated by the last Pope, the late John Paul II, during his papacy. It is interesting that a warning to examine Biblical and scientific evidence in light of each other, was John Paul's warning, as a result of official church documents pointing this out to be the reason for Galileo's mistreatment by the Church.
Galileo was a great scientist and man, so far as men go. The Catholic church is a great organization. That the two came into conflict is sad, but it is NOT due to some trumped-up incompatibility of science and faith. It is due to the cult of personality that caused Christians to mistakenly honor the thoughts of men over the Word of God in the Bible and the handwriting of God in Nature.
- Law and Markets;
- Jim Raptor and The Time Machine.
- Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations.
- Get A Copy.
This biography, though heavy on science, was written easily and clearly enough where even a near science and math illiterate as myself could follow the general ideas. I can and would criticize the author for having spewed so much science that, unless one understands the ins and outs of the discipline, the audience could probably not ever understand all of it well. The fact that I spent so much time scratching my head at some of the information was a huge drawback.
It seemed that Stokes actually tried to write in layman's terms, but kept slipping into technical terms. This back-and-forth could be jarring and confusing to read, and made the narrative more difficult to follow than it already was. Despite this, the book was, as I stated earlier, eminently informative readable, if not always understandable. I encourage folks to read this in order to learn the truth behind one of the biggest myths in the history of science and of the Catholic church.
Faith and science should be judged by themselves and each other, NOT by the ideas of popular men, or else heartache is inevitable.
My Blog List
I am obligated to read it and give a review on my blog and on a commercial web site such as Amazon. Thomas Nelson emphasizes their desire for honest reviews, whether positive or negative, in order to help them create a better product. The opinions above are my honest viewpoint. I want to thank Thomas Nelson for allowing me to review this book, and thank you all for reading this.
Mar 28, Grace Achord rated it really liked it Shelves: My only complaint is that it was too brief and sometimes even rushed; otherwise a good read. Mar 04, Gary rated it really liked it Shelves: Stokes does a great job of assessing Galileo according to the time he lived in rather than by our knowledge and standards. It is thus a sympathetic biography. Stokes is a philosopher, and conversant in the history of science, and so he is an ideal biographer for someone like Galileo.
I plan to move straight on to his life of Newton, which is practically a sequel to this book. Apr 18, Alexis Neal rated it it was ok Shelves: An account of Galileo's life, work, and beliefs, with particular emphasis on his interactions with the Church--his attitude toward the Church, and the Church's somewhat inconsistent reactions to his research and ideas. Most notably, Stokes claims that Galileo never intended to rebel against the Church, but saw himself as a devoted Catholic and was constantly surprised by the violence with which his writings and teaching were opposed.
Informative, to be sure. But Stokes can't seem to make up his An account of Galileo's life, work, and beliefs, with particular emphasis on his interactions with the Church--his attitude toward the Church, and the Church's somewhat inconsistent reactions to his research and ideas. But Stokes can't seem to make up his mind whether he's writing a serious biography or a more lighthearted account of Galileo's life and work.
I enjoy the writer-as-storyteller trope, but Stokes comes across as unable to decide whether he wants to insert his own voice into the book. The result is choppy and disconnected writing--at times Stokes presents a straightforward historical account, at other times a humorous commentary on the events. The presentation of those events, too, is full of stops and starts; it lacks a smooth story arc. Which, of course, is true of history, but need not be true of biographical accounts of that history.
The book seems to be well-researched, and in the hands of a better writer it could have been much stronger and more compelling. Also, I confess that after a while, all the extremely similar Italian names started to run together. Which is no fault of Stokes', though I suppose a more skillful author might have offered more assistance to the reader in wrestling with the long list of characters in Galileo's story.
I know more about Galileo now than I did before, but I didn't necessarily enjoy the process overmuch. Disclosure of Material Connection: I was not required to write a positive review. When an author goes to that much effort to validate what he is saying, you walk away feeling like you have read an accurate account and not simply one author's opinion. The second thing I noticed about the author is his, for lack of a better word, personableness. I don't think that is a real word, at least the spell-checker is telling me that it isn't, but that's the best I could do. I tell you this because I felt, while I was reading this, as if I was hearing the story from a close friend of Galileo's, someone who really knew him, and someone who cared about his story.
To be able to write about someone in such a way that you walk away feeling you got all of the historical facts in an accurate manner and at the same time you feel as though you were talking to an acquaintance is a hefty task. Whether or not Mitch Stokes was attempting to accomplish that goal or not, I have no idea, but that is how I walked away from this book. As much as Galileo was a scientist and sought to have his mathematics and his science to correlate perfectly with the observable world, he also had great respect for the church.
IP-адрес данного ресурса заблокирован в соответствии с действующим законодательством.
This book included example after example where Galileo demonstrated his submission to the authority of the church. Others are unexpected guests. Whether the person is Galileo, William F. Buckley, John Bunyan, or Isaac Newton, we are now living in the world that they created and understand both it and ourselves better in the light of their lives. Their relationships, struggles, prayers, and desires uniquely illuminate our shared experience. It's no mystery how profound a role Galileo played in the Scientific Revolution.
Less explored is the Italian innovator's sincere, guiding faith in God. In this exhaustively researched biography that reads like a page-turning novel, Mitch Stokes draws on his expertise in philosophy, logic, math, and science to attune modern ears with Galileo's controversial genius. Emerging from the same Florentine milieu that produced Dante, da Vinci, Machiavelli, Michelangelo, Amerigo Vespuci, Galileo questioned with a persistence that spurred his world toward an unabating era of discovery.
Stokes confronts the myth that Galileo's stance on heliocentricity stood astride a church vs. To read this volume is to journey through Galileo's remarkable life: Andrews College in Moscow, Idaho. He received his Ph. At Yale, he earned an M. He also holds an M. He and his wife, Christine, have four children.